Share:

US-ALT 1(SR228 EB) over UNIVERSITY BLVD. (SR-109

Map 

Coordinates:
+30.29667, -81.60139
30°17'48" N, 81°36'05" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:US-ALT 1(SR228 EB) over UNIVERSITY BLVD. (SR-109
Structure number:720282
Location:SR-228EB/UNIVERSITY BLVD.
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:61.0 ft. [18.6 m]
Total length:182.1 ft. [55.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:42.0 ft. [12.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:46.9 ft. [14.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Skew angle:24°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1967
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:12,250 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:12% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:40.8 tons [37.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.9 tons [32.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:77.5
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$502,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201577.5Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood12250
March 201377.8Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood9900
March 201178.8Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood10250
March 200978.4Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood13000
March 200781.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood12250
March 200579.3Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood12500
March 200380.3Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood12500
March 200180.3Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood11500
April 199976.1Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood14500
April 199779.3Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood14375
April 199575.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood22250
March 199376.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good19870
May 199176.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good13420