+30.37833, -81.91333
30°22'42" N, 81°54'48" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:724049
Location:1.15 MI NORTH OF CR 119
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:16.7 ft. [5.1 m]
Total length:92.2 ft. [28.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:12.1 ft. [3.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:22.3 ft. [6.8 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1958
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:6
Main spans material:Wood or timber [7]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2015 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:51 [as of 2013]
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:31.4 tons [28.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:23.3 tons [21.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:47.8
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$1,015,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201547.8Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryPoor51
January 201347.8Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryPoor51
January 201147.8Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryPoor51
January 200938.2Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySerious51
January 200738.2Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySerious51
January 200540.3Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySerious51
January 200349.9Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor51
January 200155.8Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor51
January 200056.8Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor51
January 199956.8Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor51
January 199757.4Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor51
February 199584.0Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood51
February 199383.0Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood31
March 199183.0Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory31