Share:

Krome Ave. S.R.997 over MIAMI CANAL C-6

Map 

Coordinates:
+25.94139, -80.43944
25°56'29" N, 80°26'22" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:Krome Ave. S.R.997 over MIAMI CANAL C-6
Structure number:870134
Location:S OF DADE COUNTY LINE
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02]
Length of largest span:38.1 ft. [11.6 m]
Total length:113.9 ft. [34.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:28.2 ft. [8.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:33.1 ft. [10.1 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1960
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Precast Panels [2]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:14,100 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:11% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:50.5 tons [45.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:32.9 tons [29.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:61.6

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201561.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood14100
April 201362.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood13200
June 201261.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood13600
April 201161.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood13300
April 200962.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood17500
April 200765.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood21800
March 200565.9Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good10400
March 200369.1Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good10400
March 200168.8Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good10600
February 199971.2Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good6800
February 199772.8Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good5400
February 199572.7Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good5400
February 199376.7Not deficientGoodVery GoodVery Good3836
January 199176.7Not deficient-Very GoodVery Good3836