Share:

SR 836 WB On Ramp over SR836 WB/SR953/NW 14 St.

Map 

Coordinates:
+25.78528, -80.26389
25°47'07" N, 80°15'50" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:SR 836 WB On Ramp over SR836 WB/SR953/NW 14 St.
Structure number:870242
Location:SR 836/SR 953 Interchange
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Tolls:Yes, on toll road [2]
Length of largest span:93.5 ft. [28.5 m]
Total length:731.7 ft. [223.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:21.3 ft. [6.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:25.6 ft. [7.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.7 ft. [5.1 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:State Toll Authority [31]
Year built:1968
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:75,750 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:61.1 tons [55.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.6 tons [33.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:87.2

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201587.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood75750
June 201387.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood75750
November 201187.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood75750
December 200981.5Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryGood75750
January 200885.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood8200
January 200685.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood8200
January 200485.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood8200
January 200285.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood8200
January 200085.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood8200
20000.0Not applicable---60000
June 199787.0Not deficientGoodGoodGood8200
January 199587.9Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood8200
December 199286.9Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood8111
April 199186.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good3350