I-95 NB (870356) over SW8 ST - NW8 ST/MIAMI R
Map
Coordinates:
+25.77028, -80.1991725°46'13" N, 80°11'57" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | I-95 NB (870356) over SW8 ST - NW8 ST/MIAMI R |
| Structure number: | 870453 |
| Location: | DOWNTOWN INTERCHG |
| Purpose: | Carries highway overpass (third level) over highway and waterway |
| Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11] |
| Length of largest span: | 200.1 ft. [61.0 m] |
| Total length: | 6196.2 ft. [1888.5 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 61.4 ft. [18.7 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 64.3 ft. [19.6 m] |
| Vertical clearance below bridge: | 75.1 ft. [22.9 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1967 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 6 |
| Main spans material: | Steel continuous [4] |
| Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 50,750 [as of 2009] |
| Truck traffic: | 3% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | In place and functioning [2] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Operating rating: | 71.5 tons [65.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 42.9 tons [39.0 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 50.3 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $551,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 103,500 [as of 1997] |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | In place and functioning [2] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Operating rating: | 71.5 tons [65.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 42.9 tons [39.0 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 85.8 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 93,275 [as of 1988] |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | In place and functioning [2] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 63.4 tons [57.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 37.6 tons [34.2 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 88.8 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $25,000 |