Share:

COMP SR-976 over SNAPPER CREEK CANAL C-2

Map 

Coordinates:
+25.73194, -80.38333
25°43'55" N, 80°22'60" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:COMP SR-976 over SNAPPER CREEK CANAL C-2
Structure number:870614
Location:200' E OF SR 821/PIKE
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over relief for waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:29.2 ft. [8.9 m]
Total length:87.3 ft. [26.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:93.2 ft. [28.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:111.6 ft. [34.0 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1960
Year reconstructed:1992
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Precast Panels [2]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:48,000 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:66.1 tons [60.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:41.8 tons [38.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:72.3

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201472.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood48000
May 201271.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood54000
May 201072.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood48000
May 200871.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood50500
May 200671.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good53000
May 200472.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good47500
May 200272.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good45500
April 200092.8Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good51500
April 199891.5Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good60500
April 199691.8Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good58488
April 199491.2Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good58488
April 199267.7Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good58488
June 199067.7Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good58488