Share:

SR 4 - US 1 (SBL) over BIG SATILLA CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+31.65827, -82.43207
31°39'30" N, 82°25'55" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:SR 4 - US 1 (SBL) over BIG SATILLA CREEK
Structure number:000000000500070
Location:6.5 MI N OF ALMA
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02]
Length of largest span:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Total length:600.1 ft. [182.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:38.1 ft. [11.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:41.3 ft. [12.6 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1953
Year reconstructed:2001
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:20
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,390 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:31.7 tons [28.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:18.8 tons [17.1 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:78.4
Estimated cost of work:$3,516,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201478.4Not deficientGoodGoodGood2390
June 201278.4Not deficientGoodGoodGood2390
June 201078.4Not deficientGoodGoodGood2860
June 200878.4Not deficientGoodGoodGood2860
May 200678.4Not deficientGoodGoodGood2740
May 200478.4Not deficientGoodGoodGood2850
May 200275.0Not deficientGoodGoodGood2800
May 200052.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood2800
October 199852.5Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good2800
March 199675.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood2800
March 199478.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood2400
April 199278.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood2160
July 199078.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood2160