Share:

SR 23 over N PRONG ST MARYS RIV O/F

Map 

Coordinates:
+30.36414, -82.13540
30°21'51" N, 82°08'07" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:SR 23 over N PRONG ST MARYS RIV O/F
Structure number:000000004900130
Location:.14 MI N OF FLORIDA ST LN
Purpose:Carries highway over relief for waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Total length:254.9 ft. [77.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.6 ft. [8.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:33.8 ft. [10.3 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1955
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:17
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Precast Panels [2]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,470 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:44.6 tons [40.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:73.1
Estimated cost of work:$1,495,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201573.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory2470
July 201373.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory2470
July 201174.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood2360
June 200966.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood3300
May 200766.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood3250
June 200566.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood3100
June 200366.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood3000
August 200165.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood2800
October 199982.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood2500
February 199783.2Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good2300
February 199583.9Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good2300
January 199387.4Not deficientGoodVery GoodVery Good1970
January 199187.5Not deficientGoodVery GoodVery Good1940