+31.52512, -84.82317
31°31'30" N, 84°49'23" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:FAS 933 over SPRING CREEK
Structure number:000000006100140
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Total length:89.9 ft. [27.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1954
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:6
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Precast Panels [2]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2015 

Status:Open, would be posted or closed except for temporary shoring [D]
Average daily traffic:420 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:6.9 tons [6.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:4.0 tons [3.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:28.6
Estimated cost of work:$527,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201528.6Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair420
May 201328.6Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair420
May 201127.1Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair440
May 200928.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair370
May 200728.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair370
May 200528.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair530
April 200328.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair500
February 200365.9Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair500
May 200127.9Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor700
June 199927.9Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodPoor700
June 199728.1Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodPoor475
April 199528.1Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodPoor475
April 199342.5Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodPoor475
May 199142.5Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodPoor475