OLD SR 5 over TOCCOA RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+34.98743, -84.3706634°59'15" N, 84°22'14" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | OLD SR 5 over TOCCOA RIVER |
| Structure number: | 000000011150420 |
| Location: | IN MCCAYSVILLE |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 149.9 ft. [45.7 m] |
| Total length: | 180.8 ft. [55.1 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 17.7 ft. [5.4 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 17.7 ft. [5.4 m] |
| Vertical clearance above deck: | 12.1 ft. [3.7 m] |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1928 |
| Year reconstructed: | 1935 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2] |
| Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
| Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, posting recommended but not legally implemented [B] |
| Average daily traffic: | 620 [as of 2007] |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
| Operating rating: | 30.7 tons [27.9 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 17.8 tons [16.2 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 28.6 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 850 [as of 1998] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 22.7 tons [20.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 15.8 tons [14.4 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 40.0 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,205,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 850 [as of 1990] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 22.8 tons [20.7 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 10.9 tons [9.9 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 27.9 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |