Share:

BEECHER STREET over UTOY CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+33.74251, -84.53499
33°44'33" N, 84°32'06" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:BEECHER STREET over UTOY CREEK
Structure number:000000012103860
Location:IN ATLANTA
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:56.1 ft. [17.1 m]
Total length:56.1 ft. [17.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:47.6 ft. [14.5 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1972
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:3,560 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:38.6 tons [35.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:22.8 tons [20.7 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:79.8
Estimated cost of work:$328,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
December 201479.8Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood3560
December 201279.8Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood3560
December 201079.8Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good3440
December 200879.8Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good3440
December 200679.9Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good3000
December 200479.6Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good4010
November 200279.5Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good4200
December 200076.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good11370
July 199876.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good11370
January 199578.7Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good10460
January 199378.9Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good9700
March 199192.2Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good9250