CHATTAHOOCHEE AVE. over PEACHTREE CREEK TRIB.
Map
Coordinates:
+33.80288, -84.4316633°48'10" N, 84°25'54" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | CHATTAHOOCHEE AVE. over PEACHTREE CREEK TRIB. |
| Structure number: | 000000012103970 |
| Location: | IN N W ATLANTA |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Collector (Urban) [17] |
| Length of largest span: | 26.9 ft. [8.2 m] |
| Total length: | 26.9 ft. [8.2 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 44.0 ft. [13.4 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 52.8 ft. [16.1 m] |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1946 |
| Year reconstructed: | 1960 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 14,100 [as of 2007] |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
| Operating rating: | 50.5 tons [45.9 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 29.7 tons [27.0 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 73.0 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $129,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 25,300 [as of 1998] |
| Truck traffic: | 15% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 35.5 tons [32.3 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 21.8 tons [19.8 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 60.4 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $129,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 25,300 [as of 1990] |
| Truck traffic: | 15% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 34.7 tons [31.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 21.8 tons [19.8 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 59.3 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |