Share:

RIDGEWOOD ROAD over PEACHTREE CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+33.82658, -84.44939
33°49'36" N, 84°26'58" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RIDGEWOOD ROAD over PEACHTREE CREEK
Structure number:000000012104390
Location:IN N ATLANTA
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Total length:80.1 ft. [24.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:22.6 ft. [6.9 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1924
Historic significance:Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:720 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:53.5 tons [48.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:31.7 tons [28.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:75.7
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$469,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201575.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory720
February 201375.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory720
February 201175.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory540
January 200975.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory540
January 200775.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory1030
January 200560.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory950
February 200360.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory1100
October 200057.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory11370
June 199856.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory11370
January 199556.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory10460
January 199356.2Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory9700
January 199155.3Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory9250