Share:

PARK DRIVE over PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY

Map 

Coordinates:
+33.78624, -84.37076
33°47'10" N, 84°22'15" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:PARK DRIVE over PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY
Structure number:000000012150880
Location:PIEDMONT PK RR717941E
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over pedestrian/bicycle trail
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:73.2 ft. [22.3 m]
Total length:216.9 ft. [66.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:41.0 ft. [12.5 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1916
Historic significance:Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Arch - Deck [11]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,202 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:40.6 tons [36.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:20.8 tons [18.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:60.3
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$1,272,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201460.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2202
October 201249.2Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair2202
January 20123.8Structurally deficientImminent FailureImminent FailureCritical2202
February 201135.8Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor1900
January 201035.8Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor1900
January 200933.7Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor1900
January 200731.5Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor2010
January 200533.9Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor1560
January 200333.9Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor1560
November 200031.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor2725
February 200031.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor2725
June 199731.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor2725
February 199530.9Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor2725
January 199330.9Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor2725
February 199129.1Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor2725