Share:

LOTUS AVE. over PROCTOR CREEK TRIB

Map 

Coordinates:
+33.78756, -84.46428
33°47'15" N, 84°27'51" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:LOTUS AVE. over PROCTOR CREEK TRIB
Structure number:000000012151540
Location:IN N W ATLANTA
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:26.9 ft. [8.2 m]
Total length:26.9 ft. [8.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:18.0 ft. [5.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:20.3 ft. [6.2 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1925
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:1,940 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:47.5 tons [43.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:28.7 tons [26.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:70.7
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$158,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201570.7Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory1940
January 201359.7Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryFair1940
January 201159.7Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryFair1900
January 200970.7Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood1900
February 200760.3Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood1990
January 200560.3Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood1560
February 200360.3Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood1560
November 200060.3Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood1820
January 199960.3Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood1810
June 199760.3Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood1710
February 199560.2Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood1710
February 199360.2Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood1710
February 199160.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood1640