Share:

MOUNTAIN WAY RD over NANCY CREEK TRIB.

Map 

Coordinates:
+33.86908, -84.36749
33°52'09" N, 84°22'03" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:MOUNTAIN WAY RD over NANCY CREEK TRIB.
Structure number:000000012152350
Location:IN N ATLANTA
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:24.9 ft. [7.6 m]
Total length:24.9 ft. [7.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Skew angle:20°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1955
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2014 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:1,940 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:34.7 tons [31.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:20.8 tons [18.9 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:62.4
Estimated cost of work:$147,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
December 201462.4Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood1940
December 201260.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood1940
December 201060.4Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood1900
January 200960.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood1900
January 200760.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood1990
January 200560.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood1560
January 200360.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood1560
November 200062.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood1820
November 199862.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood1810
June 199762.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood1640
February 199562.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood1640
December 199262.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood1640
January 199163.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood1640