Share:

KUHIO HWY over HANALEI RIVER

Map 

Coordinates:
+22.21026, -159.47554
22°12'37" N, 159°28'32" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:KUHIO HWY over HANALEI RIVER
Structure number:007005600500123
Location:0.81MI NW/HONU RD
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:106.0 ft. [32.3 m]
Total length:112.9 ft. [34.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:17.1 ft. [5.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:23.6 ft. [7.2 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1912
Year reconstructed:2000
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Truss - Thru [10]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2011 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:8,580 [as of 2007]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:45.1 tons [41.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:33.4 tons [30.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:51.1
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$4,533,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201151.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory8580
December 200851.1Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory8580
January 200722.3Structurally deficientGoodGoodSatisfactory7500
April 20015.0Structurally deficientFairPoorSatisfactory7500
June 20006.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorGood7500
March 20000.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorGood7342
July 19976.3Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairGood7342
June 199616.0Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood6423
January 199416.0Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood5573
September 19910.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairPoor5573