FM over BR SQUAW CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+42.33333, -94.2972242°19'60" N, 94°17'50" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | FM over BR SQUAW CREEK |
| Structure number: | 000000000078120 |
| Location: | 0852504 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
| Length of largest span: | 60.0 ft. [18.3 m] |
| Total length: | 87.9 ft. [26.8 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 17.1 ft. [5.2 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 18.0 ft. [5.5 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1916 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2] |
| Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main span design: | Arch - Thru [12] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 35 [as of 2007] |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4] |
| Scour condition: | Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7] |
| Operating rating: | 14.9 tons [13.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 9.9 tons [9.0 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 22.4 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $446,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 50 [as of 1995] |
| Truck traffic: | 14% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7] |
| Operating rating: | 14.9 tons [13.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 9.9 tons [9.0 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 27.2 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $272,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 50 [as of 1986] |
| Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 14.9 tons [13.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 9.9 tons [9.0 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 33.2 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $272,000 |