BIG CREEK RD. over BIG CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+42.60000, -91.8861142°36'00" N, 91°53'10" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | BIG CREEK RD. over BIG CREEK |
| Structure number: | 000000000220880 |
| Location: | 0761809 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 100.1 ft. [30.5 m] |
| Total length: | 118.1 ft. [36.0 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 15.4 ft. [4.7 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 15.7 ft. [4.8 m] |
| Vertical clearance above deck: | 13.1 ft. [4.0 m] |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1929 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
| Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 110 [as of 2005] |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 9.8 tons [8.9 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 7.8 tons [7.1 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 17.9 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $550,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 110 [as of 1997] |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 9.9 tons [9.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 7.9 tons [7.2 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 20.8 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $240,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 60 [as of 1988] |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 9.9 tons [9.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 7.9 tons [7.2 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 22.8 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $240,000 |