Share:

LOCAL over COTTONWOOD CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+41.96389, -95.95278
41°57'50" N, 95°57'10" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:LOCAL over COTTONWOOD CREEK
Structure number:000000000250240
Location:083443403
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:46.9 ft. [14.3 m]
Total length:121.1 ft. [36.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:21.7 ft. [6.6 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1949
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2014 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:15 [as of 2008]
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:29.5 tons [26.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:19.8 tons [18.0 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:61.2
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201461.2Not deficientFairSatisfactoryFair15
April 201261.2Not deficientFairSatisfactoryFair15
May 201071.8Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory15
June 200871.8Not deficientGoodGoodGood15
May 200652.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good40
April 200452.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good40
April 200252.3Structurally deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good40
March 200052.3Structurally deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good40
February 199852.3Structurally deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good40
February 199652.3Structurally deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good40
March 199452.3Structurally deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good40
June 199252.3Structurally deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good40
April 199052.3Structurally deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good50