Share:

LOCAL LEGNO over CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+43.38611, -91.75000
43°23'10" N, 91°45'00" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:LOCAL LEGNO over CREEK
Structure number:000000000348650
Location:099082404
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:23.0 ft. [7.0 m]
Total length:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:15.4 ft. [4.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:15.7 ft. [4.8 m]
Skew angle:45°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1961
Historic significance:Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2016 

Status:Posted for other load-capacity restriction [R]
Average daily traffic:10 [as of 2009]
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:52.9 tons [48.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:34.9 tons [31.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:68.3
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201668.3Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory10
April 201479.3Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory10
March 201279.3Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory10
March 201079.2Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory10
March 200879.2Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory10
April 200680.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10
April 200481.9Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10
February 200281.9Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10
March 200081.8Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood-
February 199881.7Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood-
July 199681.7Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood-
April 199482.0Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood-
April 199282.0Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood-
June 199063.1Not deficientSatisfactoryFairGood-