Share:

I- 90,94 SEB &RV J over SACRAMENTO AVE

Map 

Coordinates:
+41.93591, -87.70260
41°56'09" N, 87°42'09" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:I- 90,94 SEB &RV J over SACRAMENTO AVE
Structure number:016012300000000
Old structure number:000016012303821 (from 1992 edition)
Location:2.7 M NW IL 64
Purpose:Carries highway overpass over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:87.6 ft. [26.7 m]
Total length:200.8 ft. [61.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:139.1 ft. [42.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:146.3 ft. [44.6 m]
Skew angle:39°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1957
Year reconstructed:1993
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:140,600 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:75.2 tons [68.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:47.7 tons [43.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:92.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$3,320,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201592.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood140600
March 201392.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood140900
May 201194.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood159300
June 200975.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood155000
August 200775.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood145650
August 200575.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood148500
October 200475.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood148700
July 200375.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood145450
May 200275.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood144550
July 200075.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood151700
February 199975.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood147550
October 199775.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood144650
October 199685.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodVery Good126300
October 199485.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodVery Good104300
December 199385.6Functionally obsoleteExcellentGoodVery Good123500
December 199280.6Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryGood127000
December 199182.0Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryGood127000