Share:

I- 90,94 JFK over RR - UP &ASHLAND AVE

Map 

Coordinates:
+41.91483, -87.66775
41°54'53" N, 87°40'04" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:I- 90,94 JFK over RR - UP &ASHLAND AVE
Structure number:016013300000000
Old structure number:000016013303831 (from 1992 edition)
Location:0.2 M NW IL 64
Purpose:Carries highway over highway and railroad
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:185.0 ft. [56.4 m]
Total length:1547.3 ft. [471.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:116.1 ft. [35.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:192.3 ft. [58.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Skew angle:25°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1959
Year reconstructed:1994
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:9
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Girder and floorbeam system [03]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:304,900 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:64.5 tons [58.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:39.6 tons [36.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:62.0
Recommended work:Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. [36]
Estimated cost of work:$16,113,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
October 201562.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory304900
November 201362.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory292200
May 201235.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorPoor301700
October 201148.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorPoor323400
November 201048.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorPoor323400
November 200864.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair305200
November 200675.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory312000
November 200475.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory319900
August 200375.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory303600
June 200275.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory306200
July 200075.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory310200
November 199875.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory309900
September 199775.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory300000
November 199675.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodSatisfactory272200
October 199475.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood203400
December 199358.0Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory247000
November 199258.0Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory268400
December 199158.0Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory268400