Share:

ADAMS ST over I- 90,94 JFK

Map 

Coordinates:
+41.87924, -87.64544
41°52'45" N, 87°38'44" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:ADAMS ST over I- 90,94 JFK
Structure number:016058900000000
Old structure number:000016058904266 (from 1992 edition)
Location:0.2 M N I-290
Purpose:Carries highway overpass over highway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:99.7 ft. [30.4 m]
Total length:282.5 ft. [86.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:42.0 ft. [12.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:69.9 ft. [21.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1955
Year reconstructed:1999
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:8,900 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:50.3 tons [45.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:29.3 tons [26.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:74.5
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$3,134,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201474.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory8900
November 201274.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood8900
November 201073.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood8900
June 200973.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood7600
April 200773.9Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood7600
May 200573.9Not deficientVery GoodGoodVery Good9009
July 200373.9Not deficientVery GoodGoodVery Good9009
July 200173.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodVery Good9009
June 199973.9Functionally obsoleteExcellentGoodVery Good9000
June 199859.9Structurally deficientPoorFairFair9000
September 199759.9Structurally deficientPoorFairFair9000
November 199643.9Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor9000
January 199449.0Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor9000
December 199265.0Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryFair9000
January 199263.0Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryFair9000