Share:

PULASKI RD over I-290 IKE & CTA

Map 

Coordinates:
+41.87400, -87.72530
41°52'26" N, 87°43'31" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:PULASKI RD over I-290 IKE & CTA
Structure number:016073800000000
Old structure number:000016073804368 (from 1992 edition)
Location:2.7 M W US 34
Purpose:Carries highway over highway and railroad
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:66.9 ft. [20.4 m]
Total length:204.1 ft. [62.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:50.9 ft. [15.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:67.9 ft. [20.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:13.8 ft. [4.2 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1953
Year reconstructed:1991
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:17,400 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:13% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:66.3 tons [60.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:43.5 tons [39.5 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:75.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$3,207,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201475.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory17400
September 201257.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory17400
September 201077.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory17400
October 200877.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood18100
October 200677.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood18100
February 200577.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood26200
June 200377.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood26200
November 200177.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood26200
March 200077.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood26200
April 199877.0Not deficientVery GoodSatisfactoryVery Good26200
August 199777.0Not deficientVery GoodSatisfactoryVery Good15200
October 199677.0Not deficientVery GoodGoodVery Good15200
August 199477.0Not deficientVery GoodGoodVery Good15200
November 199377.0Not deficientVery GoodGoodVery Good27800
April 199277.0Not deficientExcellentGoodVery Good27800
September 199177.0Not deficientExcellentGoodVery Good27800