I- 90,94 SB TOI-55 over ARCHER, BNSF & IC RR


+41.84569, -87.64951
41°50'44" N, 87°38'58" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:I- 90,94 SB TOI-55 over ARCHER, BNSF & IC RR
Structure number:016106200000000
Old structure number:000016106226380 (from 1992 edition)
Location:0.1 M W I-94
Purpose:Carries highway overpass (third level) over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:65.6 ft. [20.0 m]
Total length:588.0 ft. [179.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:30.5 ft. [9.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:33.8 ft. [10.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:18.0 ft. [5.5 m]
Skew angle:15°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1964
Year reconstructed:1990
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:12
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:24,150 [as of 2015]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:94.8 tons [86.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:57.0 tons [51.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:84.3
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$1,833,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201584.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory24150
July 201384.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory24000
July 201181.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory48000
August 200981.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory48000
July 200881.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory48000
June 200681.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory48000
July 200475.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory48000
June 200375.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood48000
October 200175.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood38709
January 200075.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood38700
200075.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood38700
March 199875.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood38700
June 199675.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good38700
February 199575.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good38700
September 199375.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good32600
October 199275.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodVery Good32600
August 199175.0Functionally obsoleteExcellentGoodVery Good32600