115TH ST EB over I- 94 BISHOP FORD


+41.68619, -87.60154
41°41'10" N, 87°36'06" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:115TH ST EB over I- 94 BISHOP FORD
Structure number:016204200000000
Old structure number:000016204226358 (from 1992 edition)
Location:3.6 M SE I-57
Purpose:Carries highway overpass over highway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:57.1 ft. [17.4 m]
Total length:154.5 ft. [47.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:35.1 ft. [10.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Skew angle:24°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1960
Year reconstructed:1987
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:3,675 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:52.4 tons [47.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:32.8 tons [29.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:74.6
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$584,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201474.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory3675
September 201275.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory21000
September 201075.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory10500
February 200975.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory10800
March 200776.6Functionally obsoleteGoodFairSatisfactory10800
April 200575.6Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood18500
April 200375.6Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood10500
April 200176.6Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood10200
April 200076.6Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood10200
June 199976.6Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood10200
June 199875.6Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood10200
May 199777.6Not deficientGoodFairGood10200
September 199576.6Not deficientVery GoodFairVery Good9900
December 199487.6Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good9900
May 199387.6Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good9900
August 199287.6Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good9900
November 199187.6Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good9900