Share:

WEST KINZIE ST over I- 90,94 JFK

Map 

Coordinates:
+41.88904, -87.64796
41°53'21" N, 87°38'53" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:WEST KINZIE ST over I- 90,94 JFK
Structure number:016205600000000
Old structure number:000016205626317 (from 1992 edition)
Location:0.9 M N I-290
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:82.4 ft. [25.1 m]
Total length:166.0 ft. [50.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.9 ft. [7.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:21.3 ft. [6.5 m]
Skew angle:37°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1959
Year reconstructed:1997
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Other [9]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:5,000 [as of 1997]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:68.8 tons [62.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:40.6 tons [36.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:74.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$1,068,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201474.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood5000
October 201277.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood5000
November 201077.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood5009
December 200877.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryVery Good5009
February 200777.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryVery Good5009
February 200577.0Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryVery Good5009
September 200377.0Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryVery Good5009
April 200277.0Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryVery Good5009
June 200077.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryVery Good5009
June 199877.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryVery Good5009
October 199679.4Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryVery Good-
October 199479.4Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryVery Good-
December 199379.4Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryVery Good-
December 199280.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodVery Good-
January 199280.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodVery Good-