Share:

ML KING DR over I- 94 BISHOP FORD

Map 

Coordinates:
+41.71344, -87.61383
41°42'48" N, 87°36'50" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:ML KING DR over I- 94 BISHOP FORD
Structure number:016212000000000
Old structure number:000016212004404 (from 1992 edition)
Location:0.7 M SE I-57
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:62.3 ft. [19.0 m]
Total length:170.6 ft. [52.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:65.3 ft. [19.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:83.0 ft. [25.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1960
Year reconstructed:1999
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:10,650 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:106.9 tons [97.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:79.9 tons [72.6 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:96.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$2,625,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201496.0Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood10650
May 201276.0Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood6700
May 201096.0Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood6700
June 200896.0Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood11700
July 200596.0Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood11009
January 200296.0Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good11009
January 200096.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good11000
200096.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good11000
September 199865.0Structurally deficientPoorFairFair11000
September 199665.0Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory11000
November 199549.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory11000
December 199449.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory11000
May 199349.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory11000
August 199249.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory11000
November 199149.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory11000