I- 90,94 NB TO 290 over I- 90,94


+41.87596, -87.64532
41°52'33" N, 87°38'43" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:I- 90,94 NB TO 290 over I- 90,94
Structure number:016244900000000
Old structure number:000016244921812 (from 1992 edition)
Location:0.4 M N ROOSVLT RD
Purpose:Carries highway overpass over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:84.0 ft. [25.6 m]
Total length:455.7 ft. [138.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:28.9 ft. [8.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1960
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:7
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Latex Concrete or similar additive [3]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:30,000 [as of 2015]
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:54.9 tons [49.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:32.8 tons [29.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:36.7
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$2,459,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201536.7Structurally deficientFairFairPoor30000
April 201354.4Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair29600
April 201156.9Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair34109
April 201058.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair34109
September 200858.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory34109
September 200658.0Functionally obsoleteGoodFairSatisfactory34109
October 200470.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory34109
October 200270.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood34109
September 200070.4Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood34100
October 199970.4Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory34100
November 199770.4Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory34100
June 199670.4Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory34100
May 199470.4Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory22600
October 199370.4Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory22600
August 199264.9Structurally deficientSeriousGoodGood22600
March 199170.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood22600