I-290 WB TO I90,94 over I- 90,94


+41.87574, -87.64556
41°52'33" N, 87°38'44" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:I-290 WB TO I90,94 over I- 90,94
Structure number:016245000000000
Old structure number:000016245021813 (from 1992 edition)
Location:0.9 M W STATE
Purpose:Carries highway overpass over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:87.9 ft. [26.8 m]
Total length:1324.9 ft. [403.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:28.9 ft. [8.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1960
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:24
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Other [9]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:4,350 [as of 2014]
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:42.0 tons [38.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:25.3 tons [23.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:69.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$5,390,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201469.0Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair4350
April 201430.2Structurally deficientFairCriticalFair3950
April 201268.8Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair12600
November 201167.2Structurally deficientFairFairPoor10600
March 201059.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair89500
March 200865.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair10600
March 200665.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair10600
March 200465.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair10600
June 200265.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair12509
June 200065.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair12500
June 199948.6Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor12500
June 199848.6Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor12500
June 199676.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory12500
May 199473.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory10300
October 199373.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory10300
August 199273.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood10300
March 199174.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood28100