130TH ST over I- 94 BISHOP FORD

Map 

Facts 

Name:	130TH ST over I- 94 BISHOP FORD
Structure number:	000016260029330
Location:	5.5 M SE OF I-57
Purpose:	Carries highway over highway
Route classification:	Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:	103.7 ft. [31.6 m]
Total length:	205.4 ft. [62.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:	87.9 ft. [26.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:	95.1 ft. [29.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:	14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Skew angle:	32°
Owner:	State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:	1991
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:	2
Main spans material:	Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:	Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:	Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

2010 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	19,600 [as of 2006]
Truck traffic:	16% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:	69.3 tons [63.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:	43.6 tons [39.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:	95.0

2000 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	20,900 [as of 1998]
Truck traffic:	3% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Very Good [8 out of 9]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:	69.3 tons [63.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:	43.6 tons [39.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:	95.0

1992 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	13,300 [as of 1986]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:	69.3 tons [63.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:	43.6 tons [39.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:	96.0

Comments