Share:

UPPER LEVEL TERMIN over LOWER LEVEL TERMINAL

Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:UPPER LEVEL TERMIN over LOWER LEVEL TERMINAL
Structure number:016658500000000
Old structure number:000016658533923 (from 1992 edition)
Location:T3 (SPANS 25X-36)ORD
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:89.9 ft. [27.4 m]
Total length:1420.0 ft. [432.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:95.5 ft. [29.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:112.9 ft. [34.4 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1960
Year reconstructed:2001
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:15
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Latex Concrete or similar additive [3]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:1,000 [as of 2006]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:96.0

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201596.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory1000
February 201396.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory1000
March 201196.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood1009
June 200896.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good1009
October 200596.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good-