+40.24311, -89.36119
40°14'35" N, 89°21'40" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:FAS 559A over SUGAR CREEK
Structure number:054304800000000
Old structure number:000054304813511 (from 1992 edition)
Location:4.4 Mi N I-55
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:74.2 ft. [22.6 m]
Total length:328.1 ft. [100.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:26.9 ft. [8.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:28.9 ft. [8.8 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1976
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2016 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:325 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:15% of total traffic
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7]
Operating rating:59.5 tons [54.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:66.0

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201666.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorFair325
March 201466.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorFair325
March 201269.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorGood325
January 201296.0Not deficientGoodGoodGood325
February 201096.0Not deficientGoodGoodGood350
January 200696.0Not deficientGoodGoodGood650
January 200496.0Not deficientGoodGoodGood650
January 200296.0Not deficientGoodGoodGood650
February 200096.0Not deficientGoodGoodGood650
200096.0Not deficientGoodGoodGood650
February 199896.0Not deficientGoodGoodGood500
February 199695.8Not deficientGoodGoodGood500
March 199490.7Not deficientGoodGoodGood500
January 199390.7Not deficientGoodGoodGood500
February 199190.7Not deficientGoodGoodGood500