TR 518 16 E over SANGAMON RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+39.76739, -89.3454939°46'03" N, 89°20'44" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | TR 518 16 E over SANGAMON RIVER |
| Structure number: | 000084321418689 |
| Location: | 6.0 S LANESVILLE |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 180.1 ft. [54.9 m] |
| Total length: | 622.1 ft. [189.6 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 15.1 ft. [4.6 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
| Vertical clearance above deck: | 14.1 ft. [4.3 m] |
| Owner: | Town or Township Highway Agency [03] |
| Year built: | 1901 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
| Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
| Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 100 [as of 2007] |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Operating rating: | 5.9 tons [5.4 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 4.0 tons [3.6 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 25.2 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,322,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 75 [as of 1998] |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Operating rating: | 5.0 tons [4.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 4.0 tons [3.6 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 25.3 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,322,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 19 [as of 1991] |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 5.0 tons [4.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 4.0 tons [3.6 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 21.8 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,322,000 |