Share:

CASSOPOLIS STREET over CHRISTIANA CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+41.69500, -85.97167
41°41'42" N, 85°58'18" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CASSOPOLIS STREET over CHRISTIANA CREEK
Structure number:2000201
Location:00.10 N OF BEARDSLEY
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:51.2 ft. [15.6 m]
Total length:54.5 ft. [16.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:26.2 ft. [8.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:40.4 ft. [12.3 m]
Skew angle:15°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:2001
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main span design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:13,870 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:44.9 tons [40.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:79.3

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201479.3Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood13870
September 201277.3Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood13870
November 201077.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood13870
December 200878.7Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good11071
November 200676.7Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good11071
October 200479.4Not deficientVery GoodExcellentExcellent12943
July 200279.4Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent12943
May 200044.9Functionally obsoleteGoodFairFair12573
July 199844.4Functionally obsoleteGoodFairFair14100
September 199553.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair12897