CR 100E over EEL River
Map
Coordinates:
+40.85528, -86.0558340°51'19" N, 86°03'21" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | CR 100E over EEL River |
| Structure number: | 5200022 |
| Location: | 0.8 S of SR 16 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 111.9 ft. [34.1 m] |
| Total length: | 230.0 ft. [70.1 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
| Vertical clearance above deck: | 12.5 ft. [3.8 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1915 |
| Year reconstructed: | 1982 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
| Main spans design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
| Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
| Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Bridge closed to all traffic [K] |
| Average daily traffic: | 125 [as of 2007] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Critical [2 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 22.1 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,300,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 100 [as of 1997] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
| Operating rating: | 12.9 tons [11.7 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 8.9 tons [8.1 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 36.2 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $710,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 100 [as of 1991] |
| Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 9.9 tons [9.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 6.9 tons [6.3 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 25.4 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $501,000 |