CR 175E over SUGAR Creek
Map
Coordinates:
+40.08306, -86.8708340°04'59" N, 86°52'15" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | CR 175E over SUGAR Creek |
| Structure number: | 5400044 |
| Location: | 1 S of CR 400N |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 77.4 ft. [23.6 m] |
| Total length: | 225.1 ft. [68.6 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 28.9 ft. [8.8 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1991 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete continuous [6] |
| Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 225 [as of 1998] |
| Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 44.6 tons [40.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 99.0 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $4,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 225 [as of 1998] |
| Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 44.6 tons [40.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 93.9 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $2,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 100 [as of 1986] |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 4.0 tons [3.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 3.0 tons [2.7 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 20.3 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $440,000 |