COXFORD Rd over SUGAR MILL Creek
Map
Coordinates:
+39.89833, -87.2330639°53'54" N, 87°13'59" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | COXFORD Rd over SUGAR MILL Creek |
| Structure number: | 6100172 |
| Location: | 0.1 E of US 41 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 99.4 ft. [30.3 m] |
| Total length: | 119.8 ft. [36.5 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 14.8 ft. [4.5 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
| Vertical clearance above deck: | 12.8 ft. [3.9 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1906 |
| Year reconstructed: | 1977 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1] |
| Main span material: | Wood or timber [7] |
| Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
| Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
| Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 64 [as of 2008] |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
| Operating rating: | 14.9 tons [13.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 10.9 tons [9.9 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 27.7 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $701,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 58 [as of 1996] |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Operating rating: | 12.9 tons [11.7 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 9.9 tons [9.0 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 39.9 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $111,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 100 [as of 1990] |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 9.9 tons [9.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 7.9 tons [7.2 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 35.5 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $482,000 |