Share:

COXFORD Rd over SUGAR MILL Creek

Map 

Coordinates:
+39.89833, -87.23306
39°53'54" N, 87°13'59" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:COXFORD Rd over SUGAR MILL Creek
Structure number:6100172
Location:0.1 E of US 41
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:99.4 ft. [30.3 m]
Total length:119.8 ft. [36.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:12.8 ft. [3.9 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1906
Year reconstructed:1977
Historic significance:Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1]
Main span material:Wood or timber [7]
Main span design:Truss - Thru [10]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Wood or Timber [7]

2010 Inspection 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:64 [as of 2008]
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4]
Operating rating:14.9 tons [13.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:10.9 tons [9.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:27.7
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$701,000

2000 Inspection 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:58 [as of 1996]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:12.9 tons [11.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:9.9 tons [9.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:39.9
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$111,000

1992 Inspection 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:100 [as of 1990]
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6]
Operating rating:9.9 tons [9.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:7.9 tons [7.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:35.5
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$482,000