Share:

BECKS MILL Rd over MILL CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+38.53694, -86.15444
38°32'13" N, 86°09'16" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:BECKS MILL Rd over MILL CREEK
Structure number:8800071
Location:00.20 N of VINCENNES Trai
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:63.0 ft. [19.2 m]
Total length:149.9 ft. [45.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:19.7 ft. [6.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1920
Historic significance:Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Arch - Deck [11]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:675 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:27.0 tons [24.5 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:44.8
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$800,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201544.8Structurally deficientFairPoorSatisfactory675
August 201444.8Structurally deficientFairPoorSatisfactory675
August 201247.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory675
August 201047.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory649
May 200849.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory649
September 200649.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory624
May 200476.6Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory600
August 200276.6Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory600
January 200176.6Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory600
November 199876.6Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory600
August 199676.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood600
August 199476.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood600
July 199240.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood600
May 199074.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood600