Share:

LOCAL C.0-18.8 over ROCK CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+37.04463, -96.48949
37°02'41" N, 96°29'22" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:LOCAL C.0-18.8 over ROCK CREEK
Structure number:000100911007068
Location:4.0S 0.5E OF CEDARVALE
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:100.1 ft. [30.5 m]
Total length:159.1 ft. [48.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:15.4 ft. [4.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:15.4 ft. [4.7 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1930
Historic significance:Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Truss - Thru [10]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2015 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:10 [as of 2013]
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7]
Operating rating:9.0 tons [8.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:5.0 tons [4.5 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:25.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$750,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201525.0Structurally deficientFairFairSatisfactory10
April 201441.0Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory10
August 201341.0Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory10
December 201241.0Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryGood10
November 201141.0Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryGood10
November 201041.0Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryGood10
May 200739.5Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryGood10
July 200544.5Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryGood10
July 200344.5Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryGood10
April 200142.5Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryGood10
February 199942.7Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryGood10
January 199742.5Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryGood10
February 199542.5Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryGood10
January 199345.5Structurally deficientGoodGoodGood10
February 199145.5Structurally deficientGoodGoodGood10