EE RD. over UNNAMED STREAM
Map
Coordinates:
+39.58415, -100.0571839°35'03" N, 100°03'26" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | EE RD. over UNNAMED STREAM |
| Structure number: | 000330527803600 |
| Location: | 2.5S 2.8W OF LENORA |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 28.9 ft. [8.8 m] |
| Total length: | 30.8 ft. [9.4 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 18.0 ft. [5.5 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 18.4 ft. [5.6 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1930 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
| Wearing surface: | Gravel [8] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 5 [as of 2004] |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 11.9 tons [10.8 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 6.9 tons [6.3 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 35.0 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $66,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 5 [as of 1995] |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 12.0 tons [10.9 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 7.0 tons [6.4 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 35.0 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $66,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 5 [as of 1983] |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 5.0 tons [4.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 3.0 tons [2.7 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 35.0 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $66,000 |