O TERR. over UNNAMED STREAM
Map
Coordinates:
+39.36994, -99.8397939°22'12" N, 99°50'23" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | O TERR. over UNNAMED STREAM |
| Structure number: | 000330551403865 |
| Location: | NORTH HILL CITY |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
| Length of largest span: | 9.8 ft. [3.0 m] |
| Total length: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 32.2 ft. [9.8 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1930 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
| Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 150 [as of 2004] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 21.8 tons [19.8 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 19.8 tons [18.0 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 52.2 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $56,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 150 [as of 1995] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 22.0 tons [20.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 19.9 tons [18.1 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 52.3 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $56,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 150 [as of 1980] |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 9.9 tons [9.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 9.9 tons [9.0 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 40.9 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $82,000 |