LOCAL RD. 148 over UNNAMED STREAM
Map
Coordinates:
+38.91406, -98.1636138°54'51" N, 98°09'49" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | LOCAL RD. 148 over UNNAMED STREAM |
| Structure number: | 000530731304500 |
| Location: | 1.0S 8.1W OF WESTFALL |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
| Total length: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 21.3 ft. [6.5 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 24.6 ft. [7.5 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1937 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
| Main span material: | Masonry [8] |
| Main span design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
| Wearing surface: | Gravel [8] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 35 [as of 2002] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
| Operating rating: | 44.6 tons [40.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 76.5 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $39,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 35 [as of 1994] |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Operating rating: | 44.9 tons [40.8 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 27.0 tons [24.5 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 59.8 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $39,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 35 [as of 1990] |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
| Operating rating: | 44.6 tons [40.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 59.5 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $39,000 |