LOCAL RD. 112 over BEAVER CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+39.04493, -98.1059239°02'42" N, 98°06'21" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | LOCAL RD. 112 over BEAVER CREEK |
| Structure number: | 000530737804345 |
| Location: | 0.7S 2.3E OF LINCOLN |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 44.0 ft. [13.4 m] |
| Total length: | 100.1 ft. [30.5 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 13.8 ft. [4.2 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 14.1 ft. [4.3 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1910 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
| Deck type: | Corrugated Steel [6] |
| Wearing surface: | Gravel [8] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 20 [as of 2002] |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 5.0 tons [4.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 3.0 tons [2.7 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 19.9 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $160,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 20 [as of 1994] |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 5.0 tons [4.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 3.0 tons [2.7 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 21.9 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $160,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 20 [as of 1990] |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 4.0 tons [3.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 2.0 tons [1.8 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 21.9 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $160,000 |