+37.68612, -97.46262
37°41'10" N, 97°27'45" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:430400876025020
Location:MAIZE RD. AT 2ND. ST.
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:52.2 ft. [15.9 m]
Total length:235.9 ft. [71.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:49.2 ft. [15.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:64.0 ft. [19.5 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1940
Year reconstructed:1993
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:20,500 [as of 2006]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:75.8 tons [68.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:44.9 tons [40.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:72.8

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
November 201572.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good20500
October 201374.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good20500
December 201174.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good20500
November 200974.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good20500
July 200774.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good20500
December 200277.7Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good10800
January 200077.7Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good10800
February 199778.1Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good9629
January 199578.1Functionally obsoleteExcellentExcellentExcellent10000
October 199158.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodVery Good7500
October 198958.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodVery Good7500