MAPLE STREET over WICHITA VALLEY CTR FLDWY
Map
Coordinates:
+37.68002, -97.4091537°40'48" N, 97°24'33" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | MAPLE STREET over WICHITA VALLEY CTR FLDWY |
| Structure number: | 430400876350030 |
| Location: | MAPLE AT CARLTON TWINS |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
| Length of largest span: | 87.9 ft. [26.8 m] |
| Total length: | 863.9 ft. [263.3 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 52.5 ft. [16.0 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 70.2 ft. [21.4 m] |
| Skew angle: | 33° |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1958 |
| Year reconstructed: | 1990 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 10 |
| Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete continuous [6] |
| Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Latex Concrete or similar additive [3] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 21,700 [as of 2006] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Operating rating: | 46.9 tons [42.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 40.9 tons [37.2 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 74.6 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 22,414 [as of 1995] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Operating rating: | 54.9 tons [49.9 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 49.0 tons [44.5 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 76.4 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 18,255 [as of 1988] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Excellent [9 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Excellent [9 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Excellent [9 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | There are no noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the channel. [9] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 47.5 tons [43.2 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 77.9 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $3,579,000 |