RIVERVIEW STREET over MUNCIE CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+39.10225, -94.7228239°06'08" N, 94°43'22" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | RIVERVIEW STREET over MUNCIE CREEK |
| Structure number: | 514301050000041 |
| Location: | 6250 RIVERVIEW |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
| Length of largest span: | 9.8 ft. [3.0 m] |
| Total length: | 21.0 ft. [6.4 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1940 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 195 [as of 1992] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection has failed. River control devices have been destroyed. Stream bed aggradation, degradation or lateral movement has changed the channel to now threaten the bridge and/or approach roadway. [3] |
| Culvert condition: | Large spalls, heavy scaling, wide cracks, considerable efflorescence or opened construction joint permitting loss of backfill. Considerable settlement or misalignment. Considerable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection throughout, extensive corrosion or deep pitting. [4] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 27.0 tons [24.5 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 62.7 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $286,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 195 [as of 1992] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection has failed. River control devices have been destroyed. Stream bed aggradation, degradation or lateral movement has changed the channel to now threaten the bridge and/or approach roadway. [3] |
| Culvert condition: | Large spalls, heavy scaling, wide cracks, considerable efflorescence or opened construction joint permitting loss of backfill. Considerable settlement or misalignment. Considerable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection throughout, extensive corrosion or deep pitting. [4] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 27.0 tons [24.5 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 61.7 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $60,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 178 [as of 1990] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection has failed. River control devices have been destroyed. Stream bed aggradation, degradation or lateral movement has changed the channel to now threaten the bridge and/or approach roadway. [3] |
| Culvert condition: | Large spalls, heavy scaling, wide cracks, considerable efflorescence or opened construction joint permitting loss of backfill. Considerable settlement or misalignment. Considerable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection throughout, extensive corrosion or deep pitting. [4] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; field review indicates that extensive scour has occurred at bridge foundations. [2] |
| Operating rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 54.5 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $44,000 |