Share:

99TH STREET over CONNOR CREEK TRIBUTARY

Map 

Coordinates:
+39.18363, -94.80777
39°11'01" N, 94°48'28" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:99TH STREET over CONNOR CREEK TRIBUTARY
Structure number:514301050000079
Location:99TH. ST. S OF HUTTON
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:30.8 ft. [9.4 m]
Total length:35.1 ft. [10.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:13.5 ft. [4.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1940
Year reconstructed:1993
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2015 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:32 [as of 1992]
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3]
Operating rating:23.0 tons [20.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:18.9 tons [17.2 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:50.7
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$385,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201550.7Not deficientVery GoodSatisfactoryFair32
May 201350.7Not deficientGoodFairFair32
March 201136.7Structurally deficientGoodFairPoor32
March 200952.9Not deficientVery GoodFairFair32
March 200752.9Not deficientVery GoodFairFair32
March 200552.9Not deficientVery GoodFairFair32
October 200152.9Not deficientVery GoodFairSatisfactory32
November 199952.8Not deficientVery GoodFairSatisfactory32
August 199752.9Not deficientVery GoodFairSatisfactory32
November 199554.4Not deficientVery GoodFairSatisfactory32
November 199348.9Not deficientVery GoodFairSatisfactory32
August 199155.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory31