Share:

WASSALL over GYPSUM CREEK TRIB.

Map 

Coordinates:
+37.64235, -97.30532
37°38'32" N, 97°18'19" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:WASSALL over GYPSUM CREEK TRIB.
Structure number:53040087000DC10
Location:WASSALL AT RANGE DRIVE
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Total length:88.9 ft. [27.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:32.8 ft. [10.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:44.0 ft. [13.4 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1954
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:350 [as of 2006]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:41.9 tons [38.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:25.0 tons [22.7 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:87.1

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
December 201587.1Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood350
November 201387.1Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood350
September 201188.1Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood350
November 200988.1Not deficientGoodGoodGood350
July 200757.3Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood350
November 200254.2Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory340
February 200054.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory340
March 199789.5Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory325
January 199553.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood325
May 1993100.0Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery Good312
May 1991100.0Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery Good312